Comments on: Chrome, In light

By: aloedream

aloedream — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:44:30 +0000

I hear you there mellow, STANDARDS ftlog! I think Google likes standards, because it is allowing specification to fall on another organization’s hand, and gives them a good guideline. The V8 engine is to spec, and I expect the Mozilla/Gecko crew to be figuring out how to implement the module into the browser.

As for Chrome, it may be a quick little way to bring up a page, but I don’t see it gaining huge market share in the long-run.

By: mellow_bunny

mellow_bunny — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:34:45 +0000

I just don’t see any benefits in using Chrome over Firefox at the moment.. if anything it may mean more work when it comes to web development. (PLEASE LET THEM STAY TO STANDARDS)

By: Ryan

Ryan — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:30:05 +0000

Good call lolikitsune!

By: lolikitsune

lolikitsune — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:15:11 +0000

See my response to Mike’s post. This is sort of “as expected” and not at all “shocking” imho. Also, not worthy of the UNINSTALL, UNINSTALL sentiment floating around.

By: NovaJinx

NovaJinx — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:45:03 +0000

Vague EULA-statements can be interpreted in any direction but that’s exactly why it’s not really a positive thing. Lawyers can twist anything to fit their customer’s “needs”, if Google for some reason decides to act using the rights stated on the agreement. I’m not saying that it would but when large companies are concerned, nothing is certain. I’d rather play it safe.

Well, if I was interested in Chrome to begin with. Opera for the luv ^^